Tuesday, September 29, 2020

Emotions As Explained in the Indian psychology - By R.Manoj Clinical Psychologist Psychotherapist and Counselor

 

Emotions As Explained  in the Indian psychology

In the ancient Indian literature emotions is described in the context the rasa theory of Indian aesthetics. The word rasa refers to the different sentiments invoked by a work of art, for example a piece of music. However, this reference of rasa focuses on the emotions in Indian philosophical thinking outside the territory of aesthetics. Even though any exact word which is equivalent to the term “emotion” is not found in Sanskrit, the concept nevertheless plays an important role. Sanskrit uses the terms vedanā (feeling) and bhāva (expressed emotions) to describe emotions. The description of individual emotions raga (love) dveṣa (hatred) harṣa (joy) bhaya (fear) and Soka (sorrow) are also available in these scriptures.

One of the reasons why emotions are given its due value is its relationship with cognition. Understanding the relationship between emotion and cognition is important for any explanation of reason and rationality. The importance of the role of emotions in rational deliberation and decision-making has also been acknowledged in contemporary psychology.

Many philosophers regard the emotions as an obstacle to rational thought because of the influence of the non-representational feeling. Since feelings are abstract and do not have a clear tangent structure it was inferred that they can interfere with rational thought. According to these views, rational thought, is representational and object-directed, while feelings are subject-directed and hence it can lead to disturbing interference in the thought process. The feelings by themselves, are non-rational because they arise due to imbalance of the various “humours” which happens in the physical constitution of the body. This imbalance can negatively influence rational thought.

The conception of Emotions happens in the context of the ego (ahamkara) and the true self (atman). It is an experience that indicates the nature of relationship between the ego and the outside world. Emotions arises from desires and they are viewed as involuntary reactions which is bi-polar in nature the sukha and dukha (pleasure and pain).

Emotions are related to the Manomaya kosa , the sheath of mind. But it influences both the annamaya kosha, the food sheath and the pranamaya koshas the air sheath which is evident from the physiological reactions accompanying emotions. Emotions and their affective experiences are also influenced by the intellect or the Vignanamaya kosa based on the cognitive appraisal, as well as the Anandamaya kosa, the bliss sheath  which is purely an internal the experiential aspect.

According to Indian philosophical context all emotions spring from desires. These and desire is caused by a sense of imperfection, incompleteness or non-fulfillment felt within oneself. The intensity of desire , decides the intensity of emotions experienced. When a desire is not fulfilled or when it is thwarted, it becomes the reason for rise in anger (Krodha), jealousy (Asuya), unhappiness (Dukha), and suffering. Whenever a desire is fulfilled it leads to the experiencing of happiness (Sukha) and enjoyment. But at the same time there are also the possibilities that fulfillment of a desire can and most often leads to greed (Lobha) which can result in the person craving for more and more of it. There is a yearning for larger possession and greater enjoyment which when entertained, may lead to the development of arrogance (Mada) and envy (Matsarya). It also adds another emotional experience the fear (Bhaya) of losing one’s possessions. These emotions has the tendency to cloud a person’s intellectual discrimination and lead them to a state of emotional and mental disturbance. However, not all emotions are considered detrimental. They are also seen as virtue. However allowing them to interfere with one's judgment and awareness is considered a weakness.

Nyaya-Vaiseṣika school uses a general term saṃvedana which means “feeling”, for example sukha-saṃvedana (feeling of pleasure). But it clearly distinguishes cognition (jñāna) from other mental phenomena that include a feeling, such as love or attraction (rāga) and aversion (dveṣa).  They accept the existence of the physical substances (dravya) related to the permanent immaterial self (ātman) that possess several qualities (guṇas), such as cognition, desire, effort, aversion, pleasure and pain. But the individual emotions, of attachment and aversion are regarded as defects (doṣas)  or impurities (upadhā). These defects occur out of ignorance (mithyajnana) and they give rise to actions that can lead to the feeling of pleasure or pain. The reason for regarding individual emotions of attachment or aversion as negative is because the feeling of pleasure and pain which arises out of it is responsible for increasing attachment to the worldly matters and, more importantly, for our attachment to the self which becomes an obstacle to liberation.

The Nyāya-Vaiśeṣika schools distinguishes pleasure (sukha) and pain (duḥkha) on the one hand and the experience of pleasure (sukha-pratyaya) and pain (duḥkha-pratyaya) on the other hand. Pain and pleasure are regarded as the qualities of the soul. But they need to be cognized by the self in order to experience it. This means that cognition has a special status among the qualities of self, and no other emotions can be experienced without cognition.

Another reason why cognition is an important quality is because Nyāya-Vaiśeṣika believes that it is not a defect. Whereas they believe that  emotions are always defects and these defects fall into 3 groups:

i)             Attraction (rāga) which includes love, selfishness and greed.

ii)            Aversion (dveṣa) which includes anger, jealousy, envy, malice and resentment.

iii)           Illusion (moha) which includes error, suspicion, pride and negligence

These groupings show that, according to the Nyāya-Vaiśeṣika, there are no positive emotions. Even the emotion love, which is regarded as a positive emotion in many cultures, is eventually a defect because all emotions lead to attachment and error.

The Sāṃkhya-Yoga school does not make a clear distinction between feelings and cognitions. This is because the Sāṃkhya school focuses on the division between puruṣa and prakṛti. Purusha which is pure consciousness does not contain any cognitions or feelings. Prakṛti which is primordial matter has the three qualities (guṇassattvarajas and tamas. Accirding to Samkhya school the three gunas are aligned with the relevant feelings.  sattva  is associated with pleasure (sukha), rajas with pain (duḥkha) and tamas with confusion or illusion (moha). The importance of this  dualist structure in relation to emotions is that,  both cognition and feeling belong to the domain of prakṛti which means that they are material.

The Sāṃkhya school, states that the experiences of intellect, ego, and mind, and the raw feelings such as frustration or satisfaction which is considered to be “inherently private”, are just the subtle reflections of primordial materiality. The primordial materiality undergoes continuous transformation by means of its constituents unfolding as spontaneous activities, reflective discriminations, and well defined formulation. Thus, sensations are identical with certain brain processes” would have a specific counterpart in “awareness’ that are identical with certain guṇa modalities”

According to Patañjali the difference between puruṣa and prakṛti can be understood by practicing a series of exercises that aim at clearing the mind of all of the disturbing influences, including the ones that are classified as emotions by western philisophers. Patañjali emphasizes that the mind is affected by infirmities or problems (kleśas) that prevents it from understanding the difference between puruṣa and prakṛti. Patañjali lists these infirmities as Ignorance (avidyā), egoism (asmitā), attachment (rāga), aversion (dveṣa) and adherence to boring existence (abhiniveśa). Pathanjali’s ashtanga yoga also differentiates between emotional pleasure and rational happiness. It explains that the emotional pleasure arises due to the gratification of desires and rational happiness is acquired by the eradication of desires

The Buddhist “psychology”, terms love and hatred as two infirmities (kleśas) that occur in human beings and these infirmities needs to be removed in order to attain liberation. The infirmities are love (rāga), hatred or enmity (pratigha), false views related to the five skandhas (satkāya-dṛṣṭi), pride, ignorance, doubt, bonding to extreme views, or incomplete views and attachment to practices and rituals. These kleśas can result in experiencing one or more of the five possible feelings which are pleasant feeling (sukha), unpleasant feeling (duḥkha), neutral feeling (upekṣā), happy mood (sau-manasya) or unhappy mood (daur-manasya).

In the Indian tradition, the aesthetic theories associated with dance and drama, especially the works of Bharathmuni (5th century), have contributed to the understanding of emotional experiences in which there is a strong emphasis on the experiential aspect of emotions. According to his natyasastra – the science of dance rasa the aesthetic relish or the aesthetic mood is the core to understanding affective experiences. Sage Bharata created the theory of rasa and bhava in the context of drama and theatre. This was later extended to poetry and other performing art forms.

The Natyasasthra  which is the text of dramatic deals with all three components, related to rasa (mood) and bhava (emotions). The physiological/behavioral, the cognitive, and the feelings. Bharatha suggests nine aesthetic moods or rasas corresponding to eight major emotions or bhavas. These moods are sringara (love), hasya (joy), karuna (compassion), raudra (anger), vira (courage), bhayanaka (fear), vibhasta (disgust), adbhuta (wonder), Shantha (peace). The emotions corresponding to these moods are rati (erotic), hasa (laughter / delight), soka (sorrow), krodha (anger), utsaha (energy), bhaya (fear), jugupsa (disgust), vismaya (astonishment).

1.    Sringara (Love) – love is considered as the best emotion that heals anything because it frees the ego and connects people to devotional love. This happens when we appreciate beauty which connects people to the source of love. The ultimate purpose of a being in the universe is to experience this divine love.

2.    Hasya (Joy) – is the sense of humor which we experience through laughter, happiness and contentment. Laughter take us to a state of mind free from its usual workload of thoughts, allows a person to be open, free and happy in that moment.

3.    Karuna (Compassion) – is the state in which a person experience another person’s sadness and reflect it back. Compassion is the emotion that  connects all. Through compassion a person can relate deeply and honestly with others creates a bridge and helps people understand and empathize with others.

4.    Raudra (Anger) – is a state when the negative energy is arises with in a person with significant force. When anger is not given adequate attention then it can bring up irritation, violence and hatred. The best way to handle anger is to feel it, without taking any action and letting it move through you .

5.    Vira (Courage) – It is strong and vibrant mood which can also be termed as bravery, confidence, determination, self-assurance and valor. Vira is manifested when there is a felt need to call upon the warrior within you.

6.    Bhayanaka (Fear) – is the state that which arises due doubt, worry, insecurity etc. that shuts down the functional abilities of a person.

7.    Vibhasta (Disgust) – is the result of being judgmental with regard to self or others which can result in Self pity, aversion and self hatred.

8.    Adbhuta (Wonder) – is the state of curiosity or mystery which occur when a person become fascinated with the very idea of life. It is also the state  playfulness and innocence where a person enters into a state of complete appreciation and become an explorer or adventurer.

9.    Shanta (Peace) – is the state reflected in deep calmness and relaxation, when a person become still, quiet and at peace, the peace that arises within the person.

Bhava Theory

            According to the Bhava theory of emotions there is a trigger, or a condition which stimulates the affect. This trigger is known as the vibhāva. The vibhāva is the cause (kāraṇa) which leads to the affect (bhāva). It comprises of the stimulant (uddīpana) and the relevant perception (ālambana). The affect is triggered by a stimulant and  supported by the perceptual framework of the individual. This affect   experienced by the individual is the rasa. There are nine basic affects. These basic affects can also collude with each other leading to the development of all possible emotions. For example a mix of shame and fear can lead to feelings of guilt, while hatred can be a mix of gloom and disgust and Horror is a mix of fear, gloom and disgust.

The body also experiences the physical changes due to the affects. There are eight variations of these physical experiences described which are considered to indicate the presence of affect (bhāva). The physical changes or experiences described are inability to react, paralysis (stambha), sudden perspiration (sveda), change in the hair follicle (romancha), change in voice (svara-vikāra), shivering or trembling (vepathu), change in skin tone (varṇavikāra), shedding tears (asru), and loss of sense or consciousness, fainting (pralaya).

           Bhāva theory describes thirty-three mixed or distorted transient emotions (vyabhicāri-bhāva) which stay for a while once it arises. They are moha (delusion), mati (inaction), nirveda (despair), avega (agitation), tarka (debate), unmada (madness), viṣada (depression), utsuka (restlessness), autsukya (impatience), capala (insensitive) glani (weakness), shanka (apprehension), Srama (fatigue), dainya (misery), augrya or ugrata (cruelty), cinta (anxiety), trasa (fright), irṣya (jealousy), asuya (envy), amarṣha (resentment), garva (arrogance), smṛti (recollection),  avahittha (dishonesty), vyadhi (sickness), maraṇa (death), mada (intoxication), svapna (dreaming), nidra (sleeping), prabodha (awakening), vriḍa (shame), apasmara (epilepsy), alasata (idleness), and alasya (laziness).

 In Indian traditional approaches, distinction is made between the basic emotions, and the accessory ones. The basic emotions which are expressed regularly are the permanent emotional dispositions or sentiments which is termed as sthayibhava. These are considered as the innate emotions that transform other accessory emotions into themselves. The sthayibhavas are considered as permanent mental traces (samskaras) within oneself. These permanent emotions accompanied with source (vibhava), transitory emotions (vyabhicaribhava), and expressions (anubhava) can give rise to rasa. Emotions that are transitory are not innate. They disappear after the permanent emotions show up. Transitory emotions represent the affect that is experienced in day-to-day normal life where similar emotions are expressed and experienced in changing situations. vyabhicaribhava  or accessory emotions are transitory states. They are subordinate to the permanent emotional dispositions. Thus these theories have dealt with the conceptions of emotions which also provide cues for managing heightened affect.

One of the ancient tamil literature Tholkappiam which is assumed to have been written in 1st century AD extensively deals with customs, habits, polity and grammar of the olden days. It also describes in detail the psychophysiological aspects of human emotions. Tholkappiam classifies Emotions into eight types which is Nagai or Laughter, Azhugai meaning crying indication sadness, llivaral indicating dejection with guilt and religious living, Maoitkail meaning Wonder, Achcham or Fear, Oovagai meaning Jubilation, Veguli meaning Anger or Resentment and Perumidham indicating buoyancy, or Elation. Tolkappiyam classifies the theory of rasa as ‘Meypaatiyal” which means physical expressions, or manifestations of the emotions that are felt within oneself.

Ayurveda states that emotions result from thought and are associated with mood, temperament, personality, disposition and motivation in a person. Emotions are experienced due to the increase in rajas and tamas gunas. They happen due to “decrease of intelligence” (Pradnyaparadha) or willful lapse of wisdom which is one the  main cause of diseases. Ayurveda classified emotions into 13 types. They are Sukha /Ananda meaning joy Pleasure, Cheerfulness, Eagerness, Contentment etc, Dukkha meaning Grief, Sorrow, Kama denoting love, Affection, Attraction, Attachment, Infatuation, Longing, forgiveness and compassion, Mada or Intoxicating mood, Lust and passion, Krodha or anger Rage, Disgust, Annoyance, Matsarya meaning envy or Jealousy, Lobha or greed, Vishada indicating sadness, suffering, disappointment, Shame and neglect, Udvega or depression, Bhaya or fear, Chinta which indicates anxiety , Worry, Nervousness, Irshya  signifying Competitiveness, Ascharya indicating Surprise, Frustration and irritation.

Ayurveda emphasized that the emotions experienced by a person is related to the combination of a persons predominant gunas Rajas, tamas and sattva and the tri dhosas the vada, pitta and kapha. It also stated in detail how the negative emotions affect different parts of the body based on the predominant guna and dhosa in the person

The emotions associated with the combinations are as follows

Ø  Sattva and Vata : Joy, Surprise

Ø  Sattva and Pitta : Longing.

Ø  Sattva and Kapha: Love, Affection, Attraction, Compassion, Forgiveness

Ø  Rajas and Vata: Hyperactivity, Nervousness, Fear, Anxiety.

Ø  Rajas and Pitta: Aggressive competitiveness. Intoxicating mood, lust, passion, disgust, infatuation.

Ø  Rajas and Kapha :Attachment, Greed, Possessiveness.

Ø  Tamas and Vata :Confusion, Lack of direction, Indecisiveness, Sadness, Suffering, Shame, Grief or sorrow, Neglect.

Ø  Tamas and Pitta : Anger, Rage, Hatred, Envy, Jealousy

Ø  .Tamas and Kapha “ Confusion, Depression.

Cognition - As Explained In the Ancient Indian Psychology - By R.Manoj Clinical Psychologist Psychotherapist and counselor

 

Cognition - As Explained In the Ancient Indian Psychology

 

The mental processes which includes attention, concentration, memory, judgment, evaluation, reasoning, computation, problem solving, decision making, comprehension, production of language is termed as cognition

Samkhya school

According to Sāṅkhya account, cognition is a complex process. The senses cognize their relevant objects through the physical organs. These senses also act as the objects of cognition of the psyche, which is comprised of mind (manas), intellect (buddhi), and ego (ahaṁkāra). The mind internally constructs a representation of objects of the external world with the information it receives trough the senses. The ego contributes to the creation of personal perspective of these objects in turn leading a limited knowledge and the intellect contributes understanding of the  object at a higher level which leads to the extension of the knowledge gained. The puruṣa of the individual self adds consciousness to the result even though it is a mere witness of the intellectual processes.



 

Cognition according to Pathanjali Yoga sutra

According to Patanjali's epistemology, cognition is possible only because citta (the direct perception of an object or person, a thought or a memory, a feeling, even a dream) is coloured by both the object and the mind itself. Our senses of sight, hearing, smell, taste and touch are consistently bombarded by the sensory stimulus from the external world. As the trividhaà mind defines the object, so the object defines the mind. It is the role of the Manas to register the objects of cognition and control the response. It does this by drawing information from the memory bank of karma which is stored in the mind. The model of Cognition in Sāṅkhya and Yoga is almost similar except for the fact that Buddhi in Yoga is represented by Consiousness or Chitta.

Patanjali also states Samyam is the process that can help in attaining the highest levels of cognition. Samyam involves the combined simultaneous practice of Dharaṇa (concentration), Dhyana (meditation) and Samādhi (union). The practice of Dharana, and Dhyana helps in consistent systematic internal analysis of the qualities of the material both tangent and subtle which leads to the acquisition of deeper knowledge about the qualities of the object which includes cognizing the real nature of the object, the individual outlook and judgment related to the same, the specificity and the generality, and the functions of the objects from multiple dimensions

Samyama helps in gaining mastery over the sense organs and on their power of cognition. When a person attains mastery of his sense organs, the indriyas he is able to perceive anything within the domain of Prakriti without the help of any methodical consciousness. In this stage the person can cognize without the aid of instruments in perceiving anything in the manifested Universe. This perception which is non-instrumental is direct and instantaneous.

 Practice of samyama can help in attaining instantaneous cognition can be attained without the use of any intermediaries. Complete mastery over the original roots of the nature or the creative principles of the nature can also be understood by performing samyama.

 

Vedanta school

According to Advaita Vedanta the defining characteristic of cognition is the directness of knowledge acquired through perception. Vedanta cites pleasure and pain as instances of perception that are directly understood without any sense object contact. Advaita terms perception as immediate of consciousness. It is the knowledge which is not mediated by any instrument. The process of cognition has two phases according to Vedānta Paribhāṣāv and it formulates two criterian (Prayojaka), corresponding to the two phases of the process. The two phases are

1.    The determination of the perceptual character of cognition (Jiinnapratyaksatva)

2.    The determination of the perceptual character of the object (Visayapratyaksatva).

According to Advaita manas is a part of a complex, unified inner-organ which is termed antahkarana, which literally means the 'inner vehicle.' Adavita sometimes uses Manas and antahkarana  interchangeably.

The connection of the senses to an object results in perception. This perception when it is similar to the same object that appears in the cognition (tat) is the true (sat) cognition. The perception is the knowledge, which one obtains through his senses. In the case of continuous cognition there is no break in knowledge but so long as there is the cognition of a product, the mental state that assumes the form of the product is just one and not multiple, because a mental state is stated to last till another state opposed to it arises.

The subject acquires perceptual knowledge through the inner organ or instrument which is Antahkarana. The different aspects or functions of antahkarana are the buddhi(intellect), ahamkara(I notion), citta (memory).  Advaita states that the antahkarana 'goes out' through the respective sense-organs, penetrates the object on which attention is focused. This deep penetration modifies the status related to the form of the object. This transformation or modification of the antahkarana is technically termed vrtti, meaning the wave of thought or mental state.   The 'transformation' or modification of the manas (antahkarana vrtti) is the comprehending mental mode, which results in known the object.




Nyaya School

Nyaya schools approach to cognition is that cognition can have several sources. The classified theses sources follows:

1.    Laukika: Luakika is the ordinary cognition as attained through the perception of the sensory inputs through sense organs and the mental perception which happens through the mind.

2.    Aluakika or extra ordinary involves

a.    Samanyalakçana  Cognition attained through Generalization based on the perception of a particular object

b.    Jïänalakçana: this is the cognition that happens through a sense organ which perceives the quality on an object that is not attributable to it just like sensing the taste from the image of a food.

c.    Yogaja:  The cognition which happens in people who acquire supernatural abilities, by practicing yoga, which helps them to  perceive past, present and future )

A perceptual cognition arises by the connection between sensory abilities and object. This cognition is not dependent on words. Moreover it is non deviating, and clearly defined

Nyaya School explains the six kinds of connection or sannikarṣa to describe the fact that whenever the sense organs come into contact with the object we not only perceive the physical material, but also the properties that are present, the proportionality in which these properties are present and the properties that are absent which ultimately results in the comprehensive cognition. The six kinds of connections described are

1.    Samyoga: Conjunction or , the connection between a sense organs and an object

2.    Saṁyukta-Samavāya The inherent properties runs alongside, the connection between the sense organs and the  property features which are existing in the object

3.    Saṁyukta- Samaveta-Samavāya: The qualities of the matter in relative proportion which is inhered from the properties of the object that runs alongside the sense – object connection. This connection between a sense organs and the universal qualities of the object, happens as or by an instance in a property-trope or the things which are  characterized as a kind of being abstract particular or particular property.

4.    Samavāya: is the kind of connection which makes auditory perception possible based on the Inherence or the qualities of matter,

5.    Samaveta-Samavāya: is Inherence of what exists essentially or permanently, in the connection between the auditory function and universal qualities which exists within sounds leads to the comprehensive cognition of the auditory stimuli.

6.    Viśeṣya-Viśeṣaṇa-Bhāva: the Qualifier-qualified connection which allows for the perception of the presence of the qualities in relative proportion and absence the same in objects. In all cases, the perceptual cognition is born of connection between a sense and an occurring element or object.



Perception – As Explained In the Ancient Indian Psychology - By R.Manoj Clinical Psychologist Psychotherapist and counselor

 Perception – As Explained In the Ancient Indian Psychology

Perception is the direct source of knowledge  that directly leads us in understanding the reality while other sources of knowledge does not lead us to reality in a direct manner but using multiple processing of the information. In Perception we are at face to face with reality. The literal word for  ''Perception" in the ancient Indian literature is the Pratyaksa. The word ‘aksa’ means the sense organ and ‘Prati’ means all the sense organ functioning together. Therefore the word Pratyaksa means the function of each of the sense organs in respect to the objects and stimulus related to it.

To perceive a thing means to grasp or understand a thing as it is. , it is source of direct knowledge of the objective world. It proceeds directly from sensing of the object. Perception happens by sense-object contact and is not created by any antecedent knowledge

  All the Philosophical Schools accept perception to be the basic and fundamental source of knowledge. Perception is  termed as pratyaksa because it takes place through the relationship to the senses (aksam aksamprati) with the either tangible or subtle material. The contact of the sense organs with the object is termed as a nimitta karana or the cause of Perception. In it, the perception happens on the basis of ‘here and now’.

According to the ancient Indian theories the process of Perception happens in a systematic manner:

1.    First the self comes into contact with the mind.

2.    Then the mind comes in contact with the senses

3.    The senses in their turn come in contact with their objects.

4.    When the mind undergoes a modification through these contacts, then Perception follows.

All schools of Indian psychology have accepted perception or pratyaksa as an important source of valid knowledge. In fact perception is the one which is recognized by all Indian philosophers in general as the first valid source of knowledge.

 

Buddhists view of perception

Dinnaga was the first to promulgate the distinction between non-conceptual and conceptual and that all perception is non-conceptual because what constitutes seeing things as they really are must be free from any conceptual construction. His claim was that a verbal report of proper perception is strictly impossible, because such a report requires conceptualization, which cannot be perceptual in its character. The objects of conceptual awareness are created spontaneously in our minds and are essentially linguistic in its nature. On the other hand, the objector stimulus  available  does not carry a word or a name as its label. Such names or labels are not available along with the object or the stimulus, nor it is inherent in it, or even produced by it.  The stimulus –as such, does not carry the real particulars (svalakṣaṇas) along with it in any form.

According to the Buddhist thoughts a perceiver apprehends only the real particulars, after which they arbitrarily imposes concepts/words on them and erroneously believes, that these words and concepts are really there in the objects and it is integral to them. The imaginative quality of the conceptual awareness gets automatically concealed because the conceptual awareness results directly from experience and the perceiver interprets it to be a perceptual experience. The perceiver fails to notice the imagination involved and fallaciously thinks that he has really perceived the constructed world. The Buddhists emphasize that a perceiver can only perceive real particulars present. So any perceptual experience is always and only at the non-conceptual level.

 

Nyaya school

The Nyāya view regard perception as a cognitive episode triggered by causal interaction between a sensory abilities and an object. This interaction between the sense organs and the object results in the formation of sensory impression, which is nothing more than mere physiological change. This preliminary awareness, or the non-conceptual perception, is an essential first step in the process of perception. This step is customarily followed by a structured awareness of the object leading to conceptual perception. Nyaya school emphasized that cognition that is independent of preliminary sensory awareness cannot lead to a perceptual judgment. The first awareness does not in anyway destroy the perceptual character of the second. Infact it facilitates the subsequent awareness. Non-conceptual perception is an indispensable factor that laeds to the generation of conceptual perception, although memory, concepts and collateral information may also be required.

According to the Naiyāyikas vikalpa-s  are not mental creations or imaginative constructions. But they are objectively real properties and features of objects. Vikalpa here indicates the process of judging and synthesizing rather than imagining or constructing. Thus conceptual perceptions are the true  representations  of the structure of reality. The Naiyāyikas maintained the notion that the relation between word and object is created by practice in a linguistic community. Although the association between the concept and a word (nāma-vikalpa) happens convention, it is not merely a fabrication. Thus knowledge of words  is an essential part of perceptual awareness but perceptual awareness, is brought about by sensory contact with the object and, its properties exists independent of words.

The Nyaya School distinguishes two kinds of perception, the ordinary (laukika) and extraordinary (alaukika). The ordinary Perception is divided into two types, namely nirvikalpaka and savikalpaka. Both  nirvikalpaka and savikalpaka are based on reality and equally valid. It is the acknowledgement of the existence and qualities of an object without any explicit recognition or characterization or the verbal judgment of a subject whose qualities are predicated. In Perception of indefinite object of nirvikalpaka the object is expressed based on our past experience. In Perception of savikalpaka the object expressed in the proposition. In nirvikalpaka the object is comprehended as an undifferentiated whole of the universal with its specificities. In savikalpaka the objects are analyzed, fragmented and recombined into a module which has functional dependent relationship among itself. Therefore compared to the nirvikalpaka, savikalpaka is valid and more expressive.

Perception is a complex process of experience which involves both sensation and conception. All perception we have is defined because it is perceptual knowledge or perceptual judgment. Sensation is the result of the contact of sense organs with any material and conception is a form of knowledge derived through this contact. Basic sensation or simple recognition is nirvikalpa perception. But perceptual judgment or relational comprehension is savikalpa perception. Nyaya does not approve the psychical step by step theory that we have first sense-experience, then conception and then judgment. But advocates the theory that Perception is a complex presentative-representative process in which we cannot separate direct awareness from relational judgment. Acceding to Nyayaikikas Indeterminate perception forms the material out of which determinate perception is shaped and that they can be distinguished only in thought and cannot be seperated in reality. Nirvikalpa perception is the immediate recognition, the basic awareness, the direct sense-experience which is undifferentiated and non-relational. This does not involve the process of  assimilation, discrimination, analysis and synthesis based on any prior knowledge in relation to the material perceived. In savikalpa perception the Simple undifferentiated, unrelated, dumb, inarticulate awareness gained through nirvikalpa, is transformed into differentiated, relational, conceptual and articulate knowledge by using the processes which may involve assimilation, discrimination, analysis and synthesis. 

 

Mimamsa

Mimamsa school believes that the conceptual awareness is aided by memory and concepts. But it also argues that memory and concepts does not rob the object of its perceptual character, because it is the sense organs that are still functioning while they are in contact with the object. The Mimamsa school further suggests that a perceptual cognition does not arise as soon as there is contact between a sense organs and the object. They quote the example of the experience of a person entering a dimly lit room after walking in the blazing sun.  Even though the contents of the room are openly available to the senses of the person who has just walked in, he does not immediately recognize the objects that are around him. However, the person may get distinct awareness of the objects in the room and their features after a few minutes. The perceptual character of awareness is maintained as long as the connection between the sense organs and the object is intact, even though other concepts or memories intervene between the time when the initial contact with the object happens and the subsequent awareness related to the same.

The conceptual awareness can also termed as perception even though memory is involved because the functioning of the sense organs is the factor responsible creating the awareness. Mimamsa thought contend that the mind must be involved in all perceptions since it functions as a link between the sense organs and the self. The sense organs is activated by its connection with the self and, the self is the endowment of knowledge which is involved in all cognitions. In short according to Mimamsa school Perception is defined as the cognition which is the result of efficient contact of the senses with their objects. Cognition happens by the contact of the self with the mind, the contact of the mind with the sense organs and the interaction of the sense organs with the relevant objects.

According to Mimamsa School there are six kinds of Perception each based on the five external organs and one internal organ. The word artha is used for object, stimulus or conditions as it is supposed to indicate perceptible ones. The sense includes, five external senses: eye, ear, nose, tongue, skin and one internal sense organ the manas. In all kinds of Perception, there must be the contact between the organs and the object. The word ‘object’ here indicates a product (draya), such as table, chair etc, a quality (guna), such as color (rupa), texture, (sparsa), taste (rasa), smell (gandha) and sound (sabda). The object can also pleasure (sukha) and pain (Klesha). The difference in happiness and sadness happens based Perception. The word artha is used indicate object, stimulus, qualities or conditions because the contact of the sense with the relevant and appropriate object can only results in acquiring of the meaning which can lead to perceptual knowledge.

Object cognition or cognition related to quality of an object is an external Perception.  The internal cognition which is the result of mental perception is more associated with emotions involving pleasure or pain.

Samkhya school

Samkhya School states that perception is the mental portrayal of the objects, and perceptual knowledge is like any other form of knowledge which is attained through modification of buddhi or intellect. The term Pratyaksa denotes only a small portion of immediate experience according to the Samkhya School and whatever is experienced of internally remains outside the range of the definition given for Pratyaksa

Kapila, the founder of Samkhya school, defines “Perception as a cognition which takes the form of an object, being related to it". Vindyasvamin, define pratyaksa as "The sense organs come in contact with their respective objects and are accordingly modified into the form of the object”. Isvarakrsana defines Perception as a determinate knowledge in respect of every individual object.

Vacaspati’s approach to perception is that perception is a modification of the mind which leads to a definite cognition of objects which is formed by the sense-object contact. He states that, intellect (buddhi), ego (ahankara), mind (manas) and the senses (indriyas) constitute the machinery through which external object is recognized by the person. The contact od sense organs with an object triggers the senses. The manas organizes the impressions created by the senses into a perception. These perceptions thus formed is linked to self by the ego. Based on the relationship of the perception to ego the intellect finally forms the concept. This theory perception does not distinguish between proper and improper functioning of sense organ, as a result the difference between valid and erroneous perceptions is not differentiated.  Hence by this theory Perception cannot be accepted as a means of knowledge (pramāṇa).

Another definition given by Samkhya school is that perception is an ascertainment by buddhi or intellect in regard to a sense organs. This implies that perception leads to modification of the intellect in the form of selective ascertainment, brought about by the functioning of a sense organs. This characterization of perception as an “ascertainment” leading to modification of the intellect gives the idea that perception, is an instrument of knowledge, and primary means of acquiring knowledge. Ascertainment that is a part of intellect is regarded as the instrument of perception, the same Ascertainment when it becomes a part of self it is regarded as the result of the process of perception.

The function of the senses with regard to the objects is “a mere seeing of feeling” and the function of the intellect, leads to “identification” of the object. This suggests that perception is a two-stage process. The first stage is the functioning of the senses results in mere seeing or feeling the object (non-conceptualized awareness) and, later this sensory inputs are acted upon by the intellect or mind which results in a conceptual identification of the object. This two-stage process is very similar to the theories of perception given by the Mīmāṃsakas and the Naiyāyikas.

 

Yoga school

Yoga, is an allied system of Samkhya Philosophy. According to the yoga school of thought, Perception is an independent source of knowledge. Perception as described as the direct or immediate knowledge, which is not derived through the medium of some other knowledge. Perception excludes inference which is constructed through the functioning of the knowledge related to universal relationship. Perception also excludes the analogy which is produced through the functioning of the knowledge related to similarity and the verbal testimony which is produced through the functioning of the knowledge of words.

 

Vedanta school

Advaita Vedānta states Perception as a Pramana, which is the unique cause of attaining valid knowledge. According to Advaitha Vedanta the origin of perceptual cognition are due to the functions sense organs which is termed as the Karana. Perception can be attributed to the activity to our sense organs. According to Sankara the pioneer of Vedanta school, Knowledge attained through this source is more concerned with the empirical world.

It provides us the direct consciousness related to the objects which are generally obtained through the exercise of the senses. According to him, the real knowledge that emancipates from true perception or the Pratyaksa Prama is immediate and timeless knowledge (Chaitnaya). We get this knowledge through the function of antahkaranvrtti. In this Perception, the transparent Antahkarana penetrates the objects through the sense organs. The transformation that happens in the internal organ or Manas with regard to the form of the object is called antahkaranvrtti.

Perception in Vedanta school has been generally explained by Indriyartha Samnikarsha, contact of the senses and their respective objects which involves three stages. The contact of the sense organ with its object, the union of the sense with manas, mind which happened along with it and mind with atman or self. In short, the Identification of the subject and object consciousness by the conscious mind (chitta) and accepting the form of the external object is Perception.

The nature of perception without any sense-object contact are the ones related to pleasure and pain, the perceptions that are directly intuited. Advaitins consider perception is simply the immediacy of consciousness and knowledge which is not mediated by any mechanism. The Advaitins consider the sensory connection as accidental, rather than essential, to the perceptual process.

The Neo-Advaitins acknowledge the distinction between conceptual or determinate perception which they refer to as viṣayagata pratyakṣa, and non-conceptual or indeterminate perception the nirvikaplapka pratyakṣa. But they do not think that the non-conceptual perception is a prior stage of conceptualized perception, as other schools do.

Advatins accept that determinate Perception does not give knowledge of reality. They believe that indeterminate Perception is the only valid Perception. Indeterminate Perception presents the absolute Brahman or the ideal universal self alone as its cognition  which includes the concept of 'Thou art that (tat tvam asi).

Both Advaita and Samkhya are of the view that at the nirvikalpaka level the relationship between the object and the qualities does not present themselves completely. It is the level of mere sensation and at this stage, the mind does not come into play.. Subsequently, the mind interprets the sensations through the fluctuations that it experiences ( vritti) based on which a distinction is brought about between the object and its attributes. It is the Thought separates distinguishes the object from its attributes based on what is present in the object and its qualities. It is based on this differentiation we perceive object and quality in relation to each other at the savikalpaka level

Contemporary Education Models based on Ancient Indian Systems

  The educational system formulated by Mahatma Gandhi Nai-Talim (New Education)  Nai-Talim (New Education) is a well-formulated wholis...